Is Pope a 'Nope' on Eating Meat? Photo: Buda Mendes, Getty. Some animal rights activists believe Pope Francis’s recent comment about animals going to heaven could sway people from eating meat, but it will probably do little to prevent the meat- eating faithful from tucking into a full rack of baby- backs, packing in a porterhouse, or gobbling down a turkey leg.“I don’t see our customers having a problem with that,” said Mike Emerson, a pit master and co- owner of the popular Pappy’s Smokehouse in St. Peter’s Square while he was trying to console a boy who was saddened by the death of his dog. Paradise is open to all of God’s creatures,” he said, according to an article in The New York Times. Academics and experts on Catholicism said the Pope’s comments were made as a casual, pastoral statement and not as Catholic doctrine. But the remarks did spark fresh debate on whether animals possess souls and go to heaven, giving some animal activists hope that they could change people’s eating habits. According to USA Today, the Pope himself is not a vegetarian, but favors a very simple diet. The paper reported that among his favorites is the raw vegetable dish bagna cauda. Christine Gutleben, senior director of faith outreach at The Humane Society of the United States, told the Times, “If the pope did mean that all animals go to heaven, then the implication is that animals have a soul,” she said. Get the latest health news, diet & fitness information, medical research, health care trends and health issues that affect you and your family on ABCNews.com. Project Gutenberg's The Rape of the Lock and Other Poems, by Alexander Pope This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions. We have to admit that these are sentient beings, and they mean something to God.”Dan Arnold, president of Suckle. Busters, a Coppell, Texas- based maker of award- winning BBQ seasonings and sauces, said the comments are unlikely to influence his meat- eating customers. Cooking and eating meat, he and others noted, have been closely tied to religious rituals and celebrations for thousands of years. Dave Warner, director of communications for the National Pork Producers Council, told Yahoo Food the remarks shouldn’t have a noticeable impact on the pork industry, adding that he did not receive any calls from concerned council members.“Nothing Pope Francis said is at odds with eating animals,” Warner said. DID JESUS REALLY MAKE PETER POPE? Peter who stand in the stead of Christ We must always remember that one of the official titles of the pope, first. Well, comics are art, which means. The Golden Rice project wins the Patents for Humanity Award 2015. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We’ve seen the casting news, we’ve seen the set pictures—we’ve even seen the poster. But now it’s time to get our first look at the stars of Marvel’s long. What the Popes Eat: How Pope Francis Will Keep it Frugal and Healthy. Pope Francis enjoys a healthy diet, eating things like fresh. How Did Peter The First Pope DietsLeo X was not only the head of the Christian church but also the temporal ruler of the Papal States and head of the Medici family that ruled the Florentine republic. Roman Catholic doctrine teaches that the apostle Peter was the first Pope. Exactly when did this occur? Was Saint Peter the first pope? Question: . It holds that he had authority (primacy) over the other apostles. The Roman Catholic Church maintains that sometime after the recorded events of the book of Acts, the Apostle Peter became the first bishop of Rome, and that the Roman bishop was accepted by the early church as the central authority among all of the churches. It teaches that God passed Peter’s apostolic authority to those who later filled his seat as bishop of Rome. This teaching that God passed on Peter’s apostolic authority to the subsequent bishops is referred to as “apostolic succession.”The Roman Catholic Church also holds that Peter and the subsequent popes were and are infallible when addressing issues “ex cathedra,” from their position and authority as pope. It teaches that this infallibility gives the pope the ability to guide the church without error. The Roman Catholic Church claims that it can trace an unbroken line of popes back to St. Peter, citing this as evidence that it is the true church, since, according to their interpretation of Matthew 1. Christ built His church upon Peter. But while Peter was central in the early spread of the gospel (part of the meaning behind Matthew 1. Scripture, taken in context, nowhere declares that he was in authority over the other apostles, or over the church (having primacy). See Acts 1. 5: 1- 2. Galatians 2: 1- 1. Peter 5: 1- 5. Nor is it ever taught in Scripture that the bishop of Rome, or any other bishop, was to have primacy over the church. Scripture does not even explicitly record Peter even being in Rome. Rather there is only one reference in Scripture of Peter writing from “Babylon,” a name sometimes applied to Rome (1 Peter 5: 1. Primarily upon this and the historical rise of the influence of the Bishop of Rome come the Roman Catholic Church’s teaching of the primacy of the bishop of Rome. However, Scripture shows that Peter’s authority was shared by the other apostles (Ephesians 2: 1. Matthew 1. 8: 1. 5- 1. Corinthians 5: 1- 1. Corinthians 1. 3: 1. Titus 2: 1. 5; 3: 1. Also, nowhere does Scripture state that, in order to keep the church from error, the authority of the apostles was passed on to those they ordained (the idea behind apostolic succession). Apostolic succession is “read into” those verses that the Roman Catholic Church uses to support this doctrine (2 Timothy 2: 2; 4: 2- 5; Titus 1: 5; 2: 1; 2: 1. Timothy 5: 1. 9- 2. Paul does NOT call on believers in various churches to receive Titus, Timothy, and other church leaders based on their authority as bishops or their having apostolic authority, but rather based upon their being fellow laborers with him (1 Corinthians 1. Corinthians 8: 2. What Scripture DOES teach is that false teachings would arise even from among church leaders, and that Christians were to compare the teachings of these later church leaders with Scripture, which alone is infallible (Matthew 5: 1. Psalm 1. 9: 7- 8; 1. Proverbs 3. 0: 5; John 1. Peter 1: 1. 9- 2. The Bible does not teach that the apostles were infallible, apart from what was written by them and incorporated into Scripture. Paul, in talking to the church leaders in the large city of Ephesus, makes note of coming false teachers. To fight against their error does NOT commend them to “the apostles and those who would carry on their authority”; rather, Paul commends them to “God and to the word of His grace” (Acts 2. It is Scripture that was to be the infallible measuring stick for teaching and practice (2 Timothy 3: 1. It is by examining the Scriptures that teachings are shown to be true or false (Acts 1. Was Peter the first pope? The answer, according to Scripture, is a clear and emphatic “no.” Peter nowhere claims supremacy over the other apostles. Nowhere in his writings (1 and 2 Peter) did the Apostle Peter claim any special role, authority, or power over the church. Nowhere in Scripture does Peter, or any other apostle, state that their apostolic authority would be passed on to successors. Yes, the Apostle Peter had a leadership role among the disciples. Yes, Peter played a crucial role in the early spread of the gospel (Acts chapters 1- 1. Yes, Peter was the “rock” that Christ predicted he would be (Matthew 1. However, these truths about Peter in no way give support to the concept that Peter was the first pope, or that he was the “supreme leader” over the apostles, or that his authority would be passed on to the bishops of Rome. Peter himself points us all to the true Shepherd and Overseer of the church, the Lord Jesus Christ (1 Peter 2: 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2017
Categories |